Anoraks Corner by Tony Sale Back to Index  
Tony Sale's Codes and Ciphers 
The mathematician Alan Turing had been identified, at Cambridge, as a likely
candidate for code breaking. He came to the Government Codes & Ciphers
School, (GC&CS), in Broadway in London a number of times in early 1938 to be
shown what had already been achieved. He was shown the rodding method and some
intercepts of German signals enciphered on the German forces Enigma which had
the stecker board. Dilly Knox already knew that the German forces Enigma rotors
were wired differently to the commercial rotors, did not know the entry rotor
order and apparently did not know of the double encipherement of the message
key.
Alan Turing had been thinking for some time of ways to attack Enigma.
The main thrust of his ideas was based arround what is now called
"known plain text" and what became known in Bletchley Park as a "crib".
Turing realised that if traffic analysis could be used to predict the
text of some parts of the enciphered messages, then a machine
could then be used to test, at high speed, whether there were
any possible settings of the wheels which translated the
enciphered characters into the deduced characters. More
importantly, using his mathematical skills, he showed that it
was far quicker to prove that a transformation from ciphered to
deduced text precluded a vast number of possible wheel
combinations and starting positions.
GC&CS already had a few intercepts and at least one plain text /
ciphertext pair, reputed to have been smuggled to England by a Polish cipher
clerk.
Among the characteristics that Turing had found was that occasionally the
same cipher/plain text pair of characters occurred at different places in the
same message. These were known as "clicks" in Bletchley Park.
.....JYCQRPWYDEMCJMRSR
.....SPRUCHNUMMERXEINS
.................
Remember that because the Enigma machine is reversible, R>C is the same
as C>R and M>E the same as E>M.
Whether such pairings occur is determined by the rotor order and the core
rotor start positions. Turing realised that conversely the actual rotor order
and core rotor start position could be arrived at by trying all configurations
to see if these pairings were satisfied. This would only work for an unsteckered
Enigma or for a Steckered Enigma in which C and R were unsteckered. In the early
days of Enigma, only six letters were Steckered so this could happen.
Obviously just setting up a single Enigma machine and trying by keying in
would take an impossibly long time. The next step was to consider how the tests
could carried out simultaneously for a particular Enigma start
configuration.
Testing for letter pairs required a method for rapidly determining whether
such a configuration was true or false. This led to the concept of electrically
connecting together a number of Enigma machines.
This was achieved by using an "opened out" Enigma.
In the actual Enigma electrical current enters and leaves by the fixed entry
rotor because of the reflector or Umkerwaltz (U) and this precluded connecting
Enigmas together. In Turing's opened out Enigma the reflector had two sides, the
exit side being connected to three rotors representing the reverse current paths
through the actual Enigma rotors. This gave separate input and output
connections and thus allowed a number of Enigmas to be connected in series.
In the Letchworth (so called because the British Tabulating Machine factory
which made them was in the town of Letchworth), implementation, the clever thing
was to include both forward and backward wiring of an Enigma rotor in one drum.
The connections from one drum to the next were by four concentric circles of 26
fixed contacts and four concentric sets of wire brushes on the drum. Three sets
of fixed contacts were permanently wired together and to the 26 way input and
output connectors. Three drums, representing the original Enigma rotors, could
now be placed on shafts over the contacts and this was an opened out Enigma with
separate input and output connectors.
To return to the problem of checking whether C enciphers to R, ( written as
C>R ), first an offset reference from the start is required. A lower case
alphabet written over the cipher text gives this.

With a single Enigma this can occur at a vast number of drum settings. However the crib allows an opened out Enigma to be set up for each occurrence of C>R and they can all be tested simultaneously. 
If they don't then all the bottom drums are advanced one position and the
test is tried again. After 26 positions of the bottom drum the centre drum is
advanced one position and this continues until all drum positions have been
tested. Then the drums are changed to try a different drum order. A very long
process by hand which obviously asks to be automated.
This can be achieved
by an electric motor driving all the top drums simultaneously and then
"carrying" to the middle drum every 26 positions, with a further carry from the
middle to bottom rotor when this has turned through 26 positions. In this way
the drums can be driven through all 17,576 possible positions and the occurrence
of a correct position for all C>R in the crib can be checked. 
But there are still a large number of positions which satisfy the C>R
test.
What is needed is a better method for finding the rotor order and rotor
setting.
JYCQRPRYDEMCJMRSR SPRUCHNUMMERXEINS .............. 
For instance R>N at g, N>S at p and S>R at q making a loop. A
diagram showing such loops was known as a menu.But if Steckers are being used this is actually:
R Steckered to S1 enciphers to S2 Steckered to N at g, N Steckered to S2 enciphers to S3 Steckered to S at p, S Steckered to S3 enciphers to S1 Steckered to R at q. 
The problem now is to find the core positions S1, S2 and S3.
If these can be found then they are the Steckers of the menu letters. 
But Turing realised that there was another way of looking at interconnected
opened out Enigmas and that this way found Stecker connections. 
This means that a voltage placed onto the S1 input of the first opened out
Enigma, which is the Stecker of the input R, will come out on the S2 terminal
which is the Stecker of N. Since this is connected to the next opened out
Enigma, this goes in on its S2 terminal and comes out on the S3 terminal which
is the Stecker of S. This S3 input now goes through the third opened out Enigma
and comes out at S1 which is the Stecker of R. Thus the drum positions
correspond to the original Enigma positions where S1>S2>S3>S1.
The magic trick is now to connect the output terminals of the last opened out
Enigma back to the input of the first Enigma. There is now a physical wired
connection through the opened out Enigmas from the S1 input terminal to the S1
output terminal which is now connected to the S1 input terminal. This forms a
loop of wire not connected to any other terminals on any opened out Enigma.
Thus if a voltage is placed on S1 at the input it goes nowhere else, just
appears on the S1, S2 and S3 terminals. If a strip of 26 lamps is connected at
the joins between opened out Enigmas then the S1, S2 and S3 lamps will light
confirming the voltage path through S1, S2 and S3.
Now comes Turing's really clever bit. If S1 is not known and the voltage is
placed on, say, A then this voltage will propagate through the opened out
Enigmas because they are joined around from output to input, but CANNOT reach
the S1, S2, S3 loop because it is not connected to any other terminals. The
voltage runs around the wires inside the opened out Enigmas until it reaches a
terminal which already has the voltage on it. The complete vastly complex
electrical network has then reached a steady state.
Now if the lamp strip is connected at the joins of the opened out Enigmas,
lots of lamps will light showing where the voltage has reached various
terminals, but the appropriate S1, S2 and S3 lamps will not light. In favourable
circumstances 25 of the lamps will light. The unlit lamp reveals the core
letters, S1, S2 or S3. These are interpreted as the Steckers of the letters on
the menu.
When the drum order and drum positions are correct compared to that of the
original core Enigma encipherement there is just the one wired connection
through the opened out Enigmas, at connections S1, S2 and S3. But Turing also
realised that such a system of joined opened out Enigmas could rapidly reject
positions of the drums which were not the correct ones.
If the drums are not in the correct position then the loop S1, S2, S3 does
not exists and the voltage can propagate to these terminals as well. Thus it is
possible for the voltage to reach all 26 terminals at the join of two of the
opened out Enigmas. This implies that there is no possible Stecker letter and
therefore this position of the drums cannot be correct. But because of the way
the cross wiring inside real Enigma rotors is organised, closed loops of
connections can occur which are not the loops corresponding to the actual
Stecker connections being looked for. The configuration of opened out Enigmas
cannot distinguish between these spurious loops and the correct Stecker
loop.
The test for a loop of possible Steckers at a particular drum order and rotor
position is to see if either only one or 25 of the lamps are lit. If all 26
lamps light then this position can be rejected and this rejection can occur at
very high speed. The voltage flows around the wires at nearly the speed of light
so that the whole complex network stabilises in a few microseconds. What
was required was some way of automating the changes of drum position for all the
drums in synchronism and for rapidly sensing any reject situation.
In 1939 the only technology available for achieving electrical connections
from rapidly changing drum positions was to use small wire brushes on the drums
to make contact with fixed contacts on the Test Plate. This was a proven
technology from punched card equipment. High speed relays were initially the
only reliable devices for sensing the voltages on the interconnections.
Thermionic valves were tried but were not reliable enough in 1939. Later,
thyratron gas filled valves were used successfully and these were about 100
times faster than the high speed relays.
The British Tabulating Machine Co (BTM) had designed the opened out Enigmas
and built the Test Plate. The project to now build a complete search engine,
which became known as a Bombe, came under the direction of H H (Doc) Keen. The
machine, known as Victory, was completed by March 1940 and delivered to
Bletchley Park. It was first installed in one end of Hut 1. Now the work began
on finding out how to use this new device. Results at first were not very
encouraging. The difficulties in finding cribs meant that when a menu was
constructed between intercepted enciphered text and a crib, it usually did not
have enough loops to provide good rejection and therefore a large number of
incorrect stops resulted.
Then Gordon Welchman came up with the idea of the diagonal board. This was an
implementation of the simple fact that if B is Steckered to G then G is also
Steckered to B. If 26 rows of 26 way connectors are stacked up, then any
connection point can be referenced by its row letter and column letter. A
physical piece of wire can now connect row B element G to row G element B. The
device was called a Diagonal Board because such a piece of wire is diagonally
across the matrix of connections.
Now the double ended Enigma configuration knows nothing about Steckers. It
can only deduce rotor core wiring positions which satisfy the menu. However the
possible Steckers such as R<>S1, can by exploited by the Diagonal Board.
If the joins between double ended Enigmas are also connected into the Diagonal
Board at the position corresponding to the original cipher / plain text pair on
the menu, say R, then this can significantly increase the rejection of incorrect
double ended Enigma drum positions.
It has already been shown that if a set of drum positions has been found
where S1>S2>S3>S1 then a physical wired connection has been made
through the joins between opened out Enigmas at S1, S2 & S3. The deduction
from this is that R is Steckered to S1 etc. Now if the join representing R on
the menu is plugged to the R row of the Diagonal Board, a physical piece of wire
will connect through the Diagonal Board from row R at position S1 to row S1 at
position R. Since S1 is not plugged to anything the voltage on this wire goes
nowhere else. Similarly for the other joining positions between opened out
Enigmas. Thus the Diagonal Board does not affect the finding of the correct drum
positions.
But if the drums are not in the correct position to make the connection S1,
S2 & S3, then a voltage travelling around the network and finally arriving
at say row N position S will be passed via the Diagonal Board wire to row S
position N and will thus continue through the wiring in the opened out Enigmas
on both sides of the join S. The Diagonal Board thus greatly contributes to the
voltage flow around the network of wires in the opened out Enigmas due to the
extra connectivity that it provides. This increases the rejection of drum
positions which do not satisfy the menu.
This page was originally created by the late Tony Sale the original curator of the Bletchley Park Museum 